![]() ![]() We make use of examples from current debates to show that attempts to pinpoint the one and only authentic logic inevitably either yield irrefutable theories or lead to dead ends. In the first part of the paper we focus on the problem of genuine logical validity and consequence. In this paper we put forward and defend a view of the nature of logic that we call moderate anti-exceptionalism. Finally, I will discuss what modifications of this answer enter the picture when more general notions of inference are considered. I will introduce the concept of 'inferentially native' logical operators (those which explicate inferential properties) and I will show that the axiomatization of these operators leads to the axiomatic system of intuitionistic logic. ![]() Therefore, I will first try to clarify what exactly is meant by the question, and then sketch a conceptual framework in which it can be reasonably handled. ) rules), I do not think that the usual justification of it is satisfactory. ![]() Though there is little doubt that this choice is correct (provided that inference is construed as inherently single-conclusion and complying with the Gentzenian structural (. It may seem that at least since Prawitz, Dummett and others demonstrated the proof-theoretical prominency of intuitionistic logic, the forthcoming answer is that it is this logic that is the obvious choice for the accolade. The topic of this paper is the question whether there is a logic which could be justly called the logic of inference. This book is an essential resource for scholars and researchers engaged with the foundations of logical theories and the philosophy of language. They suggest that we can profit from viewing languages as "inferential landscapes" and logicians as "geographers" who map them and try to pave safe routes through them. By carefully scrutinizing the project of logical analysis, the authors demonstrate that logical rules can be best seen as products of the so called reflective equilibrium. Peregrin and Svoboda also show that logical theories, despite the fact that they rely on rules implicit to our actual linguistic practice, firm up these rules and make them explicit. In this sense, fundamental logical laws are implicit to our "language games" and are thus more similar to social norms than to the laws of nature. They present a systematic argument that the primary subject matter of logic is our linguistic interaction rather than our private reasoning and it is thus misleading to see logic as revealing "the laws of (. The authors claim that these foundations can not only be established without the need for strong metaphysical assumptions, but also without hypostasizing logical forms as specific entities. Google Play, Android and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.This book offers a comprehensive account of logic that addresses fundamental issues concerning the nature and foundations of the discipline. Unionpedia is not endorsed by or affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation. More languages soon.Īll the information was extracted from Wikipedia, and it's available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Available in English, Spanish, Portuguese, Japanese, Chinese, French, German, Italian, Polish, Dutch, Russian, Arabic, Hindi, Swedish, Ukrainian, Hungarian, Catalan, Czech, Hebrew, Danish, Finnish, Indonesian, Norwegian, Romanian, Turkish, Vietnamese, Korean, Thai, Greek, Bulgarian, Croatian, Slovak, Lithuanian, Filipino, Latvian, Estonian and Slovenian. Here is the definition, explanation, description, or the meaning of each significant on which you need information, and a list of their associated concepts as a glossary. It's a tool, resource or reference for study, research, education, learning or teaching, that can be used by teachers, educators, pupils or students įor the academic world: for school, primary, secondary, high school, middle, technical degree, college, university, undergraduate, master's or doctoral degrees įor papers, reports, projects, ideas, documentation, surveys, summaries, or thesis. ![]() It's free to use and each article or document can be downloaded. This is a giant online mental map that serves as a basis for concept diagrams. It gives a brief definition of each concept and its relationships. Unionpedia is a concept map or semantic network organized like an encyclopedia – dictionary. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |